NAROPIN Delivers Important Clinical Advantages Over Bupivacaine1-6
Because of its Distinctive Pharmacologic Profile... Unlike bupivacaine, the low lipid-solubility of NAROPIN makes it more selective for C sensory fibers than for A motor fibers7
Compared to bupivacaine...
NAROPIN acts directly on unmyelinated C sensory fibers7
NAROPIN has less of an affect on the highly myelinated A motor fibers7
Consequently, NAROPIN offers a similar sensory blockade but a shorter motor blockade7
NAROPIN is indicated for the production of regional or local anesthesia for surgery and for acute pain management.
References: 1. Beaulieu P, Babin D, Hemmerling T. The pharmacodynamics of ropivacaine and bupivacaine in combined sciatic and femoral nerve blocks for total knee arthroplasty. Anesth Analg. 2006;103:768-774. 2. McGlade DP, Kalpokas MV, Mooney PH, et al. A comparison of 0.5% ropivacaine and 0.5% bupivacaine for axillary brachial plexus anaesthesia. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1998;26:515-520. 3. Scott DB, Lee A, Fagan D, Bowler GMR, Bloomfield P, Lundh R. Acute toxicity of ropivacaine compared with that of bupivacaine. Anesth Analg. 1989;69:563-569. 4. Knudsen K, Beckman SM, Blomberg S, Sjövall J, Edvardsson N. Central nervous and cardiovascular effects of i.v. infusions of ropivacaine, bupivacaine and placebo in volunteers. Br J Anaesth. 1997;78:507-514. 5. Bertini L, Tageriello V, Mancini S, et al. 0.75% and 0.5% ropivacaine for axillary brachial plexus block: A clinical comparison with 0.5% bupivacaine. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1999;24:514-518. 6. Zaric D, Nydahl P-A, Phillipson L, Samuelsson L, Heierson A, Axelsson K. The effect of continuous lumbar epidural infusion of ropivacaine (0.1%, 0.2%, 0.3%) and 0.25% bupivacaine on sensory and motor block in volunteers: a double-blind study. Reg Anesth. 1996;21:14-25. 7. Hansen T. Ropivacaine: a pharmacological review. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics. 2004;4:781-791.